ana-air canadia-bank Silk-air nissan acleda cab-bank

India’s Supreme Court rules privacy a fundamental right

Reuters / Khmer Times No Comments Share:
Rahul Sharma, one of the Indian lawyers in the right to privacy case, speaks to the media. AFP

NEW DELHI/MUMBAI (Reuters) – India’s top court unanimously ruled yesterday that individual privacy is a fundamental right, a verdict that will impact everything from the way companies handle personal data to the roll-out of the world’s largest biometric ID card programme.

A nine-member bench of India’s Supreme Court announced the ruling in a major setback for the Narendra Modi-led government, which argued that privacy was not a fundamental right protected by
the constitution.

The court ordered that two earlier rulings by large benches that said privacy was not fundamental in 1954 and 1962 now stood overruled, and it declared privacy was “an intrinsic part of the right to life and liberty” and “part of the freedoms guaranteed” by the constitution.

“This is a blow to the government because the government had argued that people don’t have a right to privacy,” said Prashant Bhushan, a senior lawyer involved in the case.

The judgement also has a bearing on broader civil rights, as well as a law criminalising homosexuality.

Lawyers said it also impacts a ban imposed on the consumption of beef in many states and on alcohol in some states.

In his personal conclusion, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul wrote privacy is a fundamental right and it protects the inner sphere of an individual from interference from both state and non-state actors and lets individuals make autonomous life choices.

“The privacy of the home must protect the family, marriage, procreation and sexual orientation,” Justice Kaul wrote.

The ruling is the second landmark decision to come from the Supreme Court this week. On Tuesday it ruled that a law allowing Muslim men to divorce their wives instantly by uttering the word “talaq” three times
was unconstitutional, in a major victory for Muslim women who spent decades arguing it violated their right to equality. 

The ruling comes against the backdrop of a large multi-party case against the mandatory use of national identity cards, known as Aadhaar, as an infringement of privacy. There have also been concerns over
data breaches.

Critics say the ID card links enough data to create a full profile of a person’s spending habits, their friends, property they own and a trove of other information.

Aadhaar, which over one billion Indians have already signed up for, was set up to be a secure form of digital identification for citizens, one that they could use for government services. But as it was rolled out, concerns arose about privacy, data security and recourse for citizens in the face of data leaks and other issues.

Over time, Aadhaar has been made mandatory for the filing of tax returns and operating bank accounts. Companies have also pushed to gain access to Aadhaar details of customers.

Related Posts

Previous Article

North Korea signals new ICBM

Next Article

Commission calls for end to Rohingya restrictions