ana-air canadia-bank Silk-air nissan acleda cab-bank

Dayton made Bosnia and Herzegovina ungovernable

Christian Schwarz-Schilling / DW No Comments Share:
President Slobodan Milosevic of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, President Alija Izetbegovic of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and President Franjo Tudjman of the Republic of Croatia initial the Dayton Peace Accords. The Balkan Proximity Peace Talks were conducted at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Nov. 1-21, 1995. The talks ended the conflict arising from the breakup of the Republic of Yugoslavia. The Dayton Accords paved the way for the signing of the final “General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina” on Dec. 14 at the Elysee Palace in Paris. wikimedia/U.S. Air Force/Staff Sgt. Brian Schlumbohm

Leading politicians in the Western Balkan state of Bosnia and Herzegovina and neighbouring Croatia must accept that the people are now rejecting their national-chauvinist policies. In the 2018 elections in Bosnia and Herzogovina, the Croatian Democratic Union party (HDZ) suffered a hefty defeat: Not their leader, Dragan Covic, but the moderate democrat Zeljko Komsic was elected to the three-member presidency of the Balkan state.

Then, at the start of the year, the HDZ received another slap in the face in neighboring Croatia. Here, in the EU’s newest member state, the incumbent President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic – a nationalist-populist, like Covic – lost to the social democrat candidate, Zoran Milanovic.

Bosnia’s constitution was part of the Dayton Accords

In spite of this, the HDZ has clearly failed to realise that in both countries its chauvinist-reactionary policies are outdated and no longer in favour with the people. Yet everyone in the Balkans must have noticed that the Croatian nationalists’ defeats have already had political consequences.

For example, immediately after his election victory, Milanovic spoke to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is considered to be a great supporter of Bosnia. One of the issues discussed was said to be a reform of the Dayton Peace Accords that ended the war in the Balkan country 25 years ago.

Bosnia’s current constitution, written in the US city of Dayton under pressure from the US special envoy Richard Holbrooke, was part of the accords. The Dayton Constitution divides Bosnia and Herzegovina into two entities: the Republika Srpska, which is populated mainly by Orthodox Serbs, and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, where Muslim Bosniaks and Catholic Croats are in the majority.

This very complicated state structure, with several levels of government, was intended to safeguard the interests of the three largest ethnic groups in the country. In practice, however, Dayton turned Bosnia into an ungovernable state. Holbrooke himself repeatedly stressed that the Dayton Accords were not made with the intention of leaving the bad situation in Bosnia unchanged; they were supposed to be the basis for gradual progress, with the long-term prospect of the country joining the EU.

The legitimacy of the Dayton Constitution is being called into question today for three main reasons. First, it was not created democratically and contains many provisions that contravene international law. For example, only members of the three main ethnic groups are allowed to run for the office of president; members of the country’s many minorities, such as Roma and Jews, are excluded as candidates. Above all, though, Dayton needs to be changed because it is clearly dysfunctional.

So far, however, this has proved to be impossible. No amendment proposal has made it as far as parliament since 2006, because the representatives of the three biggest ethnic groups are unable to agree. Today, many Bosnians, especially in the federation, are calling for international assistance in establishing a “Dayton 2”.

Mention “Dayton 2” in the Republika Srpska, however, and you will usually encounter rejection. The Bosnian Serb leaders fear the idea because it was under the original Dayton Accords that the Republika Srpska – created during the war by the expulsion of Croatian and Muslim Bosnians – was recognised as a political entity. Under no circumstances do they want to risk its existence being called into question.

Aleksandar Vucic, the president of neighbouring Serbia, also emphasises that “without Serbian acceptance, there will be no change to the Dayton Accords”.

He is not interested in the idea that a country’s constitution should be its own internal affair. Instead, he refers to the fact that Serbia signed Dayton in 1995 as a guarantor power.

Is Bosnia never to be allowed to change its constitution without asking its not very friendly neighbours, Serbia and Croatia, for permission? Of course not. The path must finally be cleared for it to do so and this requires the support of the international community, especially the EU.

The development of Bosnia and Herzegovina is being closely followed in Brussels. In December last year, the respected German lawyer Reinhard Priebe published an EU-commissioned report on the status of the rule of law in the Balkan country.

The report stresses the need to reform the Bosnian judicial authorities, to implement the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights there and to strengthen the rule of law as a whole. But all this can only work if there is constitutional reform. And a very well-prepared international conference is needed in order for that to happen.

The new Croatian President Milanovic maintains that this is cannot be done, because all the parties to the Bosnian war would have to be brought together for a “Dayton 2”, which he says is impossible. Of course, it’s possible. All that’s required is the political will to do it. DW

 

Related Posts

Previous Article

Mike Pompeo’s divisive bid will be to no avail

Next Article

Virus battle: China’s chance to show progress