If everybody lived in the same way as the average German, we would need almost three planet Earths. If we lived like US residents, it would be almost five. That’s according to calculations by the Global Footprint Network.
But what if people chose a different lifestyle – a less consumerist one filled with less stuff?
Minimalist blogger and podcaster Elisa Stangl doesn’t have a couch or even a bed at home. She, her husband and their 2-year-old daughter sleep on Japanese tatami mats in their small flat in southern Germany. “We don’t own a lot,” she told DW.
Stangl adopted her minimalist lifestyle while still a student for financial rather than environmental reasons. Travelling the world compounded her sense that she was better off living with less.
“I just learned that I don’t need anything other than the things I have in my backpack,” she said. “So I figured, why should I need more when I’m at home?”
Now, Stangl says her main motivation is living mindfully. Having less stuff means she and her family can focus on what’s important to them. They need less money and therefore have more time for hobbies such as hiking and exploring nature.
Stangl and her family plan to move out of their apartment and into a converted van so they can spend more time travelling. Stangl also believes a minimalist lifestyle goes hand in hand with environmental responsibility. “Living a mindful life doesn’t only concern the individual,” she said. “If you get to know how to live mindfully then you know that you have to respect nature because you live with nature and it gives you something and you have to give something back.”
Beyond the decluttering craze sparked by Japanese tidying expert Marie Kondo, there’s a growing interest in getting rid of stuff, with the idea that equates living more minimally with living more meaningfully. That’s reflected in an ongoing study into minimalist lifestyles by Duke University in the US. “Typically, people adopt minimalism in the interest of their own psychological wellbeing – to reduce stress and cultivate mental clarity, for example,” the study’s lead researcher Aimee Chabot said.
“But as their practice evolves, their motivations for pursuing minimalism often expand to include more outwardly focused sources of motivation, such as environmental or ethical concerns.”
Chabot and her team have so far surveyed more than 800 people, most of them in the US. “Only about 10 percent of survey respondents said that reducing their environmental impact was their primary motivation for practicing minimalism, although about 70 percent said they did consider environmental impacts to be one of their reasons for doing so,” she said.
Even as an unintended consequence, living with less is certainly good for the planet. A 2015 study found that more than 60 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are down to household consumption. That’s mainly from transport and food, but also the other products people buy that generate carbon emissions in production.
Household consumption is of course higher in wealthier countries. As economies around the world develop, consumption is growing. The more people who have money to spend, the more stuff they buy. But it doesn’t necessarily make them happy. As studies show, higher income and bigger spending power boosts well-being only up to a certain point.
And as the minimalism trend suggests, more and more people are becoming disillusioned with the materialistic societies they live in.
In her 2014 book Happier People Healthier Planet, academic Teresa Belton argues that the factors driving human wellbeing actually have very little environmental impact.
“What generates and sustains wellbeing are all sorts of what I call ‘non-material assets’,” she told DW. “Good relationships, contact with the natural world. Being creative, having a sense of belonging and community and purpose and meaning, being actively engaged in life and things like that, which don’t involve any material consumption – or very little.”
Beyond the individual level, governments are yet to be convinced to focus on human rather than financial and material growth. But leveraging the link between human and planetary wellbeing could be key to shifting our economies away from consumption and tackling the climate crisis. DW